Score Every Support Conversation. Not 3%. All of Them.

Manual QA reviews 1 to 5% of tickets. RevelirQA scores 100%, automatically, against your own policies.

No sampling. No blind spots. No extra headcount.

See what 100% coverage looks like for your teamBook a Demo
1-5%
of tickets reviewed by manual QA
~90%
scoring accuracy vs human analysts
100%
of conversations scored automatically

Why Does Manual QA Sampling Miss Most Problems?

Sample 3% of tickets and 97% of conversations never get reviewed. Agents misquoting refund windows, skipping required disclosures, or taking wrong escalation paths can continue for weeks before a sample picks it up.

Three problems make sampling unreliable:

  • Sampling bias: reviewers pull familiar ticket types, so edge cases and low-volume errors stay hidden
  • False confidence: a 90% score on 20 tickets says nothing about quality across 500
  • Slow detection: a policy error compounds across hundreds of tickets before it shows up in a monthly review

How Does RevelirQA Score Every Conversation Without Extra Headcount?

RevelirQA ingests your QA rubric, SOPs, and knowledge base. Before scoring each ticket, it retrieves the policies for that contact reason and evaluates the agent's response against your actual standards, not a generic benchmark.

Policy-aware scoring

Retrieves your SOPs via RAG before every evaluation. Catches accuracy errors that generic rubrics miss.

100% coverage

Every ticket scored as it closes. No queue, no analyst bottleneck.

Human and AI agents

Same rubric for chatbot and human conversations. One dashboard, directly comparable scores.

Full audit trail

Every score includes the model, prompt, documents retrieved, and reasoning. On every evaluation.

Custom metrics

Binary, multi-option, or scored criteria. Configurable per team and per contact reason.

Coaching view

Shows exactly where and why agents miss policy. Specific enough to act on immediately.

What Changes for Your QA Team?

When scoring runs automatically, the QA team stops reviewing conversations and starts acting on what the data shows.

  • Coaching gets specific: show an agent the three tickets this week where they misapplied the escalation procedure, with the policy retrieved as evidence
  • Calibration gets faster: QA leads update the rubric against live data rather than waiting for monthly sample batches
  • Patterns surface in hours, not at the next review cycle
"We have manually reviewed tickets for years. Revelir is the first product that has made AI ticket review at scale actually usable."
Rendy D., Tiket.com

Where Is RevelirQA Running in Production?

RevelirQA is in production at Xendit (Indonesian fintech) and Tiket.com (Indonesia's largest travel platform). High daily ticket volumes. English and Indonesian scoring. Production deployments, not pilots.

See what 100% coverage looks like for your team
Book a Demo

Frequently Asked Questions

What percentage of tickets does manual QA typically review?

Manual QA covers between 1% and 5% of ticket volume in most enterprise support teams. RevelirQA scores 100% with no increase in headcount.

How does automated scoring stay consistent across thousands of tickets?

RevelirQA applies the same rubric, the same retrieved policy documents, and the same reasoning process to every conversation. There is no reviewer fatigue, no calibration drift, and no variation across shifts or time zones.

What helpdesks does RevelirQA integrate with?

Any helpdesk via API, including Zendesk and Salesforce. Available as SaaS or dedicated-tenant deployment for teams with data residency requirements.

Can the QA rubric be updated after setup?

Yes. Updates to your SOPs or product policies flow into scoring automatically. No manual rubric reconfiguration.

Does RevelirQA score AI chatbot conversations as well as human agents?

Yes. Same rubric, same scoring engine, directly comparable scores in one dashboard.

About RevelirQA

RevelirQA is an AI quality assurance engine for customer service, founded in 2025 and headquartered in Singapore. It scores 100% of support conversations against a team's own policies and SOPs using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), applies a consistent rubric to human agents and AI chatbots, and provides a full audit trail on every score. In production at Xendit (Indonesian fintech) and Tiket.com (Indonesian travel). Multilingual scoring in English, Indonesian, Thai, and Tagalog. Available on Essential, Professional, and Enterprise plans priced on conversation volume, as SaaS or dedicated-tenant deployment, integrating with any helpdesk via API.

💬